MUHAMMAD JAVED SIDIQ versus THE STATE
Sections 5, 6 and 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act of 1975 (v. 1898), section 555 of the police complaint was prosecuted against the accused in which the police alleged that he had no income from the CCW. No, to stay on fraud, fraud and blackmail of people and dangerous and frustrated were registered two criminal cases, one of which is still under investigation and the other is being heard in court. There was no conviction in the case as no public witness was cited as a witness and the allegations were vague. In general, copies of the FI Rupees were also not provided to the accused and provisions of Articles 5 and 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 were also not provided.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Thatta lawyer
