MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus TAJ MAHMOOD
Articles 13 and 15 of the Ordinance 1959 (1973) of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Article (199), Article 199 Application for eviction against a tenant The basis for payment of rent, additions and alterations to the premises without the permission of the landlord Was filed on On the first two grounds, but not on the basis of the settlement, it was accepted that all the tenants allegedly were co-tenants, as well as with the original order of the tenant of the tenant, were retained in the appeal. With the accused tenant together with a co-tenant, no order of eviction could be presented to the co-tenant without acting as a partisan, even though the tenant objected to the matter in his written statement, Was not attempted to create a problem by. There was no objection to the notice of appeal by the tenant. Such disputes were not raised before the courts against the tenant controller's order, which cannot be examined in the co-tenant of the constitutional proceedings, which can be examined below. He was fully aware of the proceedings before the courts and also appeared as a witness to the tenant, at no stage. Applied himself as a rent controller or appellate court and did not challenge the eviction order in front of any forum applicant / tenant, therefore, no locus raise for the benefit of the joint tenant Standby was not present.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Thana Bula Khan lawyer