Find a Lawyer

ALLAH RAKHA versus CHANDAR KHAN

The Civil Procedure Code Order VI, generally O O VI, R 17 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877) of CCP, cases 12 and 42, were formally rejected by the trial court demanding specific performance of the contract. It was not just a declaration. Applicant's request for permission to amend the plaintiff filed by the appellants to include a prayer for specific performance of the contract was rejected by the Appellate Court; there was no drastic change in the plaintiff's amended proposal But, the result was that the rules on the sale of land dependent on the cantonment and the modification of the case were really tools for the advancement of justice, and as a stumbling block in the path of amendment for the salvation of certain performance. Could not be used, in which case the claimant should have been allowed. / Applicant is subject to reasonable costs to the opposing party for any inconvenience. In respect of the amendment, the courts had to be a bit independent of the tutoring technique, because the purpose of the rules was to prevent it from doing justice. Had to increase. advocate from Lalamusa lawyer