ASHFAQ AHMED versus SHEERIN BAI MUHAMMAD ALI
Articles 14 and 17 (2) (vi) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963, Article 185 (3), Article 185 (3) Rebuilding a rental building Comprehensive building construction Whether the proposed reconstruction of a building in conflict with Section 14 Not for the sake of The residential purpose, but was a composite building consisting of commercial and residential units, the High Court, it was rightly held that under Section 14 of the Act there was no obligation for the landlord to ask for proof of the tenant. The application for leave of appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Timergara lawyer