Appeal Court was not fit for default and personal necessity for the removal of sections 13 and 15 of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance because of the construction of the building in dispute with the landlord. There was an approved plan by the relevant authority, but this fact was not disclosed in their request for eviction. No such law was required for such disclosure, nor was it necessary for the landlord to disclose these facts. Was necessary in the context of which there was no direct relevance to the dispute that an attempt was made to evict the tenant. Yep. Landlord based on default and personal need
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
