Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL GHANI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE


Section 115 and the XLI, R23 Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 do not comply with the trial court's order, but the humiliating effect against the remand order was amended by the court. The court remanded the remand order and directed the trial court to calculate the net profit consisting of the tenants' shares, but the cost of cultivation was exempt from the holding of the wrongdoer while calculating the net profit and There was no court fee from a third of such cases, which the court had also heard about. The trial court's ruling that the reimbursement order was not deductible despite the remand order was wrong and that the contempt of court against the remand order was not sustainable and was declared without legal authority and had no legal effect. Had not happened Determining a new evaluation of a suit for court fee and jurisdiction purposes

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Kotri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.