ABDUL GHANI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 115 and the XLI, R23 Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 do not comply with the trial court's order, but the humiliating effect against the remand order was amended by the court. The court remanded the remand order and directed the trial court to calculate the net profit consisting of the tenants' shares, but the cost of cultivation was exempt from the holding of the wrongdoer while calculating the net profit and There was no court fee from a third of such cases, which the court had also heard about. The trial court's ruling that the reimbursement order was not deductible despite the remand order was wrong and that the contempt of court against the remand order was not sustainable and was declared without legal authority and had no legal effect. Had not happened Determining a new evaluation of a suit for court fee and jurisdiction purposes
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kotri lawyer