DOST MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 (XLV of 1860), the 161 sentencing notice was automatically issued to increase the sentence while admitting the appeal for a hearing was not subsequently suppressed. The decision was taken and the decision was made to withdraw. The evidence for the trial was based on a valid request for evidence. In the case of any corruption, the imprisonment cannot be declared till the height of the court as the only accused, however, was 59 years of age at the time of the incident and when he was only Retired after a year. The accused is now 62 years old, has been suffering from TB for the past 7/8 years, has four unmarried daughters and no one else can earn a living for family living. Adil Bill Ahsan As has been guaranteed in the Surah al-Nahl of the Quran, it is necessary to follow in the circumstances of this matter that the notice was automatically withdrawn in order to increase the sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Mari Indus lawyer