Find a Lawyer

ATTA MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL RASHEED

Civil Procedure Code Order XXIII's Decision to Appeal and Defendant Before the Claimant's Request for Receipt of Money in the SCD Undertaking and Suite Adjustment OXXIII, R3 and OXXXVII, R3 Summary Jurisdiction The request for permission is bound by the statement of M \ 's affidavit on the facts of the receipt of such money. On the statement of the Court whether or not the loan was given to the defendant by the court in connection with the affidavit filed by M \ M by the defendant, Accordingly, the statement of justification was a very vague statement of the \ M of the case presented in the court. Likewise, the trial was not definitive and definitive, instead of prosecuting the ambiguous statement. The trial court proceeded to adjudicate the defendant's request for permission to appear and for defense, and the trial court's order was set aside and sent back to the trial court for its decision. went. Wool famous high court advocate from Amangarh lawyer