RAHIM BAKHSH versus AHMAD BAKHSH
The last male owner of the Mohammedan lawn passed away without issue, his ownership of the property was changed in favor of his wife in relation to his limited property in this land and before his death he owned some part of the land. Was gifted to the applicant who was his brother. When the last male owner died unconscious, his widow was entitled to 1/4 share and not 1/8, as the courts below. If it is conceded that the last male owner had two sons who later died due to the consent of the defendants, in addition to inheriting the 1 / 8th share, the widow also killed two of the last male owner, Than Than. As the mother of the sons was entitled to inherit the 1 / 6th share of the inheritance, the matter was not examined by the following three courts; the dispute raised by the applicants needs to be further investigated. ? The appeal was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer
