MUHAMMADSHARIF versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
The Constitution against the cancellation of the allotment petitioner / allotment was made by the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of Article 10 and 11 of the Homeless People (Land Settlement) Act, 1958. The application was granted on the basis that the applicant could not afford any opportunity after the hearing before the cancellation order was retained in the post-remand proceedings. The important thing to look for in the notification officer was that they did not get a chance to be heard, which was earlier acknowledged by the competing defendant's adviser. The remand order by the High Court, which instructed the respondents to provide opportunity for the petitioners to be heard, was not complied with and, therefore, the post-remand order was without legal authority. And there was no legal effect, the application was accepted and the government respondents were instructed to provide the applicants with an opportunity. Submit a petition against them before you hear them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer
