MANSHA ULLAH versus ALLAH DITTA
Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 Section 50 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Rehabilitation of the possession of Revenue Authorities Competitive applicants are the owners of immovable property. The plaintiff's applicant / appeal was unsuccessful and his review was pending before the Board of Revenue Board, however, ordering the status quo be maintained until the review decision, the applicants also filed a lawsuit to declare it. That they are the owners of the land that was ordered by the trial court but excluded by the appellate court as well as the respondent's question through the leave of the High Court to appeal the property of the applicants in the dispute. It was not done whether the applicants were entitled to occupy the land in this manner, according to the collector. That was considered and he decided against him, which was upheld in the appeal. The matter was still pending before the Board of Revenue even though the Board of Revenue had not retained the Collector's order as the Appellate Court Revenue Authorities. It has been confirmed that they can restore the tenants' possession in their possession when they are forced out of the ground. The appeal was made for leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Bat Khela lawyer