Find a Lawyer

SAID RAHMAN versus BACHA HARAM

The Criminal Laws (Special Provisions) of Provincially Administered Tribal Areas Rule 1975 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) referenced the husband's case for restoring the marital and marital rights of the wife to the majority of jirga members. According to the decree for the dissolution of the marriage and the recovery of the specific gold, the indoor money was approved against the husband and the dismissal of the restitution of his marital rights was recommended by the additional assistant commissioner. The new jirga ordered the appellate authority to revoke the EAC's order and the jirga reviewed the authority. According to Arshat, a decree was granted, however, in the constitutional jurisdiction, the wife's suit was allowed by the High Court rejecting the order of the reviewing authority and the constitutional application of the wife as the primary motive for the restoration of the appellate authority. The reviewing authority acted beyond its jurisdiction as it did not have the ability to tamper with the tribunal's findings to the fact that the appellate authority had already finalized it to the husband nor identified any legal defect. Nor did he argue that accepting the constitutional request was of any importance to the general public This is the case involved. In this way the wife correctly appointed the revision authority's order and restored the leave of the appellate authority to appeal. ask a advocate free from Khair Pur Mir lawyer