Find a Lawyer

AFRAZ AHMED versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB

University of Punjab Act 1973 Section 32 University of Punjab Rules Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Checking of Answering Books On the basis of the average, the candidate approving the numbers has requested the University to re-examine his answer books. Was denied. The candidate's response books could not be traced, so there was no inquiry from the university to determine the liability for the loss of the response books, which are in the custody of the university and the candidate was sent to the Securities Branch or Record Room. Which the candidate was legally entitled to check his answer books. , But illegally, discretion and bead were denied such entitlement, claiming that if his response books were not tracked, he was entitled to mark, on average, a candidate through the university. The dispute was terminated on the grounds that the previous rules allow for an average score. The basis was canceled and new rules were created in this regard, no such concession was provided. Under Section 32 of the Act's old rules, the requirement to avail the average marks required by the candidate was approved by the syndicate, which allowed the re-examination of the answer books, and otherwise the grant was made on the basis of average numbers. Under the present circumstances, the University was declared unconstitutional, unethical and against the rules and regulations of the constitutional jurisdiction and the University was required to reconsider the candidate's case and, on the basis of this, To give the number pakistani advocates Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer