Find a Lawyer

S. ZAHIR HUSSAIN versus MAHBUB JAFFER ALI

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j) and 21 (l) of the landlord and tenant agreement were executed by the appellant / alleged tenant, which was not rejected by the alleged tenant for execution. Was. On the occasion of the implementation of the tenancy agreement, the evidence headed by the respondents was disputed and the alleged landlord's attorney filed the Martial Law Authorities one year after the implementation of the alleged tenancy agreement. There was a hearing before the petition, in which it was alleged. The appellant was a perpetrator and there was no allegation in the petition that the appellant was his tenant who had not executed the tenancy agreement between the parties, the rent controller mistakenly concluded that the appellate court had erred. In the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, there is a relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties of the High Court. An order of the rent controller stating that the landlord and the tenant have no relationship between the party and that the eviction request was not permissible under the law and as such the tenant had no control over the rent. I had no jurisdiction to decide the cases. advocates from Chicha watni lawyer