TAMEEZUDDIN versus SECRETARY FOOD DEPARTMENT
Section 12A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Appellant was appointed to this position ignoring the Civil Service Rules and then Appointment of the Appellant's seniority appellant as expected to amend the Service Rules. Was objected to. The service rules were expected to be amended on 5 197 3 1977, which occurred on 21 5 1977 as a violation of the appellant's appointment of service rules, either formal or beneficial in determining the appellate retainer's order. Cannot be understood. 5 197 From the 1977 onwards, directly or indirectly, his appointment did not take effect in accordance with the applicable rules. When the rules allowed such recruitment, the service offered by the appellant was beneficial to him. May be.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Gujranwala lawyer
