ASGHAR SHAH versus FAZAL HUSSAIN
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 9 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), Section 77 (e) Sue for possession on the basis of property owned by the defendants, claiming ownership of the land and, alternatively, without adverse possession. Defendant requests under section 77 (e), Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, including adverse possession and limitation, under the title, trial, whether by a civil court or by the Revenue Court in its exclusive jurisdiction. , Was dismissed on the eve of the hearing, before the position was separated from the stand. Attempts to set up a written statement and a trial hearing may not be helpful to them as they cannot be allowed to respond to their facility and re-proceed, according to the lawsuit. Even at this stage, their legitimate property was not accepted as a real tenant. On the contrary, the plaintiff contested the tooth and nail for the title of the land in favor of the defendants, although the revenue record shows the plaintiffs in the possession of the land and the defendants as the non-occupied tenant. Yet, the overall reading of the record, the trial, the written statement and the evidence suggest that a title dispute between the parties is necessary and that it is worth a trial by the civil court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Chishtian lawyer