Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ KHAN versus ABDUL KARIM

Section 9 and 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Code of Conduct 1908, suit for declaration of section 115 title and permanent injunction restraining trial court ruled that the defendants were barred from occupying the occupied land. The plaintiff, unlawfully, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's plea of the defendants that they are co-owners of the land in the dispute, along with other recorded co-owners, after the confession and facts were proved, as the plaintiff's order. Can't take advantage of the appropriate relief from contraception. Defendants who have a legal title to the defendant can only be evicted under the law. Even if the rightful owner threatens a person with peaceful occupation, such person can approach the Supreme Court and ask for appropriate assistance from the injunction to protect his possession, even by prescription. The prescription was changed to The right to ownership was, in itself, a right that was protected and treated under Sections 9 and 42, the Special Relief Act 1877. criminal advocate from Patoki lawyer