Find a Lawyer

SANAULLAH BHUTTA versus NIAZ AHMAD

The Homeless Affiliates (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in favor of the applicant, occupied the shop adjacent to the front of the shop transfer, the applicant deleted such section. Applied to. The affiliate shop's auction but his prayer was rejected, but his review petition was also accepted by the petitioner, in which the appellate authority ruled that the part which was unauthorized was stripped again. Applicants should be reinstated and a similar reduction should be paid to the auction buyer according to the affiliate shop appellate authority's order, however, the applicant's constitutional petition was also not approved, the applicant's argument There was also a petitioner's shop by Appellate Authority to distribute the applicant and restore the illegal part. Was not made but the order was not implemented. The High Court had ignored this aspect of the case altogether, dismissing the constitutional petition as the applicant's case was an inevitable test. property advocates from Shakargarh lawyer