In Section 12 and 54 of the Shahadat (10 of 1984), the Section 79 suit for the specific performance of the contract execution agreement claimed that the plaintiff claimed that the plaintiff was the owner of the property and had contracted to sell it. Payment of the shares was received by. The brother, on whose behalf he executed the Attorney General's Power of Attorney, did not act as a plaintiff while the property owner processed a contract for sale, as well as recovering partial payment. Both parties, the plaintiff and the general attorney, refused. The defendant, after the issuance of the receipt of 19 4 2004, had to consider the sale agreement, which was not recognized as a relief between the parties under certain performance, was arbitrary relief and could only be given to the party who made Had approached the court with a clear hand. Placing the material on record to show that he was angry at the contract failed to establish that the Atal General Power of Attorney was executed by defendant in favor of his brother, as well as defendant. The plaintiff declined to issue a receipt in favor of the case
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
