Delay in filing pre-arrest appeals except Section 5 of the Mohammedan Law Pre-Emission Litigation Act (1905), aided by the Assistant Commissioner's failure to submit 1/4 of the sale price by the respondents Eliminates pre-arrest claims. Security, Appeal filed against such order, Appeal Authority acknowledged only a few years later that the interim order of the Assistant Commissioner instructed the defendant to collect 1/4 the cost because the security was unnecessary by law and it On the basis of non-compliance the final order rejecting such order was also invalid and the appeal of the appellant against such wits dismissed by the Board of Revenue can be set aside as well. A petition was filed by the respondents of the High Court along with their constitutional petition for contempt. The delay, which was allowed and remand for the latest hearing of the case, was amended by the Board of Revenue and the High Court upheld the remand order. Constitutional jurisdiction Supreme Court refuses to intervene in the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
