COMMITTEE OF ADMINISTRATION FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI CANTT. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD
Excise Duty for Productivity Capacity (Sugar) Rules 1972 Rr 3 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Reduction in excise duty Constitutional jurisdiction, complete the application made by the applicant to reduce the exercise of authority. Were considered as poor and suffered poor performance. The charge of irrigation water and pest attack was repudiated as no evidence was submitted by the applicant to provide any evidence as the authority denied any claim by the applicant. Reasons cannot be presented, but on the contrary, it is found that the amount of reduction in excise duty had already been increased by the authority in the disputed years and without giving any reason, the petitioner had the same constitutional jurisdiction. A request was made to increase the unanticipated benefits already received by the company Could not be relieved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
