Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Examining the evidence of the Customs Act, Sections 156 (1) (8) and 159 (3) of the Customs Act, 1969, the customs officer could not be considered as having 2kg of gold on a person with whom he had no enmity. Was not denied. He denied the presence of gold. He voluntarily admitted to acting as an advisor and thus there was no compliance with section 159 (3) of the Customs Act 1969, on which the gold was recovered. Was done in the presence of advisers. It was a natural prosecution, alleging that it had prosecuted the accused beyond reasonable doubt, and that the defendant's sentence and sentence were retained under the circumstances. best advocate from Gujranwala lawyer