NEELAM MAWAZ versus STATE
Section 561A & 426 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 366A suspension of punishment when the Legislature That was more appropriate. To awaken the power of suspension of punishment in the Appellate Forum against the punishments and convictions passed by the Special Courts established under the Pressure of Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, section 6161 AA, CCPC In the exercise of the powers under, the Appellate Court as such. As such the suspension of convictions will be the equivalent of a conviction and a clear defeat of the intention and purpose of the lawgiver that the High Court has the power to suspend the sentence by exercising its powers under Section 561A, CR PC Because there's no stopping it. The use of such power, the suspension of the request for suspension under section 262626 was overturned, resulting in CRPC's dismissal of jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer
