Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus MAHBOOB ALI

The closure of the Civil Procedure Code Order XVI, OXVI, R 3 evidence regarding the summoning of the CPC and the presence of witnesses provided evidence on the first date of the hearing, but failed to present evidence on the next date when their evidence Closed and his case is dismissed. The defendants' conviction for not presenting evidence that day was not intentional, but it was because of the sudden illness of their lawyer, the plaintiff, who did not compromise on not presenting evidence on that date, the trial court said in OXVII, Adopted a rigorous view in the application of the R's constitutional provisions. 3, the CPC in which the circumstances for which the dispute was not called for judgment should be on the merits rather than the ease of use of the provisions of the law if the plaintiff was required to present evidence rather than apply the penal provisions. Opportunity provided. Law top advocate from Talamba lawyer