Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA

The West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariah) Application Act 1962 Section 2A (as contained in the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act (Amendment) Ordinance (XIII of 1983)), the plaintiff claimed, claiming that the land The sale of has been claimed in favor of the claimant. The customs suit filed by the claimant against his or her rights was void and ineffective, ultimately rendering the decision against which the appeal was filed by the defendants / sellers. The appellant / defendants had requested that in view of the provisions of section 2A of the Ordinance, the decision in favor of the defendant / plaintiff has been revoked. The meeting stated that the respondents of the objection appealed that they were Ahmadi / Qadiani and being non-Muslim could not be ruled under the provisions of the ordinance. The question raised for the first time in the appeal was whether the plaintiffs / defendants were Ahmadi / Qadiani at the relevant time. The question, in fact, can be determined only after recording the evidence that the High Court remanded. Placed the court's findings aside under Case T o the trial court to decide whether the respondents were Ahmadi at the relevant time or whether the parties were permitted to present evidence in this regard. online advocate from Astore lawyer