Find a Lawyer

GULZAR versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Articles 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 (1973), Article 185 (3) of the order against the vendors of the profession were affirmed in the first appeal, the High Court, in the second appeal, the father of one Of the shopkeepers who took notice of his death, he also became the owner of the land in order to defeat the pre-emperors case, the High Court, thus, bought such vendors initially through it. Appeal allowed to the extent of 1/2 of the suit property. Subsequently, through another vendor high, the transaction Wendy also purchased 1/2 share, the court did not provide any relief to the seller regarding what it bought in connection with the shares, through another vendor. On the contrary, Wendy's applicant could not successfully verify the High Court, except on this point, on the question that many of its supplies through section 21A, the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, depended on the contrary. This affects the case, even after the purchase from another vendor, the applicant vendor is unable to respond. This type of seller was refused to appeal patent advocate from Sibi lawyer