MUHAMMADA versus MAULA DAD
West Pakistan Land Dispositions (Protection of Saving) Ordinance 1959 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff interest s interest in the interest of a professional selling his share to the professional based on his sale. With proportional land of the stakeholders, even if the provisions of section 3 of Ordinance I of 1959 are entitled to participate in the provisions, they say that in addition to the sale of the land, the share in the summits will not be paid unless on record. The available evidence does not show that the plaintiff's professional, after selling shares in Somali, complied with the provisions of the West Pakistan Land Disposition Ordinance, 1959. The same cannot be considered, therefore, the plaintiff may be entitled to an injunction in respect of candles, decisions and their part. On the contrary, the orders of the courts were set aside and the plaintiffs' case was ordered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer