ABDUL HAMEED versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Appreciated the Cage Comp Complainant did not support the prosecution's case at trial and could not find the statement in the FIR, therefore, the defendant's raid The killings could not be used against the magistrate, nor was the section CO / ACE passed. The accused was neither heard of the money nor anything in between, and the complainant had explained the amount recovered by the accused, Therefore, it cannot be assumed that the tainted money would amount to a bribe to him and, being absent, it was taken to be a crime against him. The accused was acquitted in situations targeted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Nilam lawyer
