MUHAMMAD HANIF, ASSISTANT FOOD CONTROLLER versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
R (()) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 Citizenship Equality Discrimination Impact Service Provisional compensation The case of the applicant public servant was growing more than that of his partner, named in the FIR. While the applicant's FIR did not include his name, the government employee whose name was included in the FIR was reinstated, after dragging for more than four years against the applicant and another civil servant, Whereas in a similar situation, the applicant whose name was not included will appear in the FIR with the applicant. Mtyazy treatment was not restored, Article 25 will require action on the ground.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Murree lawyer