MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the examination of the record of the evidence of section 161, did not show when the accused actually demanded an abatement and when he was accused. It was not shown when paid. The person who can do any kind of illicit favor as a bribe to the complainant was himself a party to the illegal transaction and his status was not superior to that of a partner, so his unlawful testimony is not admissible. Could, therefore, fail to prove that beyond any reasonable doubt the defendant was acquitted in the case against the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Satyana Bangla lawyer
