Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Part I and 302 Prosecutors had their own case that the incident took place at the village square where 15/16 persons were present only 3/4 step apart from the complainant and the prosecution witnesses. The accused when he was attacked by residents of Khunjar residential area was present around the incident and there was also a shop that was open and it was impossible to see the presence of so many people, the age of the accused. The assassin was only 19 years old and was selected to launch the attack, and was able to flee after the attack, especially when he was not equipped with a firearm, but kept only one dagger of the accused, The material on the record helped indicate that the accused had injured the deceased. Working under serious and sudden provocation, the chances of the accused being described in the scene were more important and closer to the truth. The prosecution avoided prosecution injury on unimportant parts, which later proved to be life-threatening, with no intention of committing the murder if it proved to be an equivalent crime, the accused being convicted of the crime of murder. The burden of possibilities cannot be overstated. Section 302, the PPC, was set aside and instead was held liable under section 304, part 1, the PPC advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer