KHAIRUNNISA versus SHAH BEHRAM
Part 4 of the Partition Act 1893 Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the amending jurisdiction of the partition of the suit, was recorded in the name of proceeding in the interest of the parties to the plot under which the two courts below the plot The harmonious results also belonged to the predecessor. The parties' interest in the absence of any evidence in the dismissal was unimaginable; in the absence of any evidence by the plaintiff / defendants, no further extension can be made to prevent such possibility, as the plot in the dispute. Was also built at the cost of their predecessor. In the interests of the points recorded by the two courts on which the construction of the house on the plot in dispute was done by the defendant / applicant, the result of not reading the evidence, attracted the revision of the High Court. Will do
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Kamalia Musa lawyer