ASAD BROTHERS versus IBADAT YAR KHAN
Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Section 16 (2) for failure to comply with the request for exclusion of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section 16 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). Attack on Tenant Defenses The Rental Controller's Temporary Rental Order High Court approved the appeal petition to appeal whether the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 for collecting water charges. Whether or not an order was granted by the Rent Controller under Section 16 (1). And submitting backrant taxes and subsequent monthly water charges and / or battery taxes, which were otherwise paid annually and at the end of the year as required by law. Whether the tenant controller is ordering the next monthly water charges and battery tax to be filed when the landlord has no prayer in his request under section 16 (1) of the Landlord Ordinance 1979 Was gone Even though there was an agreement between the parties to pay the water charges and battery tax, the agreement to pay Rs 81 per month as rent for the badmint tax was minimal. Under the West Pakistan Urban Rent Obstruction Ordinance, 1959, what was the effect of the landlord's failure to submit monthly rent as well as water charges and badmint tax? Whether it is open to the tenant to invade the defense without claiming that the order made under section 16 (1) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 was itself illegal and unlawful and the tenant had the opportunity Was without providing. To show that failure to comply with the order was not intentional. If the High Court does this
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer