SCHLUMBERGER SEACO INC. THROUGH MANAGER FOR PAKISTAN AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE
Second Schedule, Part I, CI (7) Income Tax Act (X1 of 1922), Section 4 (3) (xiii) CBR Circular, July 5, 1977, for tax exemption in respect of its foreign technicians The waiver applications filed by were rejected. The Department of the Examining Officer seeking the required details / documents states that the only downside to the application for immunity was that the relevant overseas Revenue Authority's certificates were not filed; Apply request form is not required to apply for. The submission of certificates from the Foreign Revenue Authorities could not be denied because the approved application was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Karak lawyer
