ALMAS KHAKWANI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Scheduled Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the AXLI, the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, in response to the respondent's amended suit against the Court of Appeal for rehabilitation. On appeal of the judgment, the appellants also filed an appeal against the trial court's decision to increase the restoration of the restoration. The successor judge of the appellate court, rather than restraining his attention, addressed the question raised in the rehabilitation rate which led to the entire trial court's order being banned. In which they challenged the ratification of the Family Court order as a whole, the appellate court dismissed it and the verdict was finalized, which cannot be interrupted by the successor judge of the appellate court. Is. After working beyond its powers to put this part of the final decree aside, it will be decided without legal authority and will have no legal effect, which will increase the restitution of the appeal lawyer. The appeal will be considered pending before the court and will be decided according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Dhirkot lawyer