Continuation of sections 200, 202, 439 and 537 of the Code of Criminal Procedure In a private complaint process the accused was released without first recording the complainant's statement and despite the fact that the complainant The complaint was not signed after the magistrate conducted the inquiry and was in custody at the time of filing the complaint, which was filed by a competent lawyer under the authority of an authority without recording the first statement without complaint. There was an irreversible cure under the process, being a CRPC and complainant. In custody, circumstances were beyond his control, no serious notice could be taken, even if the complaint was not signed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1991
