GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE
Sections 4 (1) and 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), Section 161 The evidence investigator had no enmity with the accused. Which I later found. Ones recovered from his possession that he did not accept the fraudulent money because the bribe was thus passed on to the accused under section 4 (1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and thereby, successfully prosecuted. The sentence was not declared, so legality was not granted. , Raised that the accused had received a fraudulent currency note through the bribe, which resulted in the suspect beyond reasonable doubt demanding and accepting the bribe, and the punishment and conditions of the accused were upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Lalshanra lawyer