ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD versus AIJAZ AHMAD
Establishment of Articles 22, 39 (1) (d) and 51 collective bargaining agent of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and the application of the contract, the application of the collective bargaining agent of the Establishment raised some demands through the industrial dispute. The signing was determined by an agreement with the CBA Unions and the Establishment, which was effective from 1988. The workers who remained in service until September 1988 were to leave the job and wages and other allowances stipulated under the contract. After claiming to pay the commitment and the difference in wages paid. The benefits of the contract were given to the employees from 1 1988 to the time they were in employment until September, 1988, they were entitled to receive the same contract when the collective bargaining agent had settled the industrial dispute and settled the matter. Then it was also representing the workers of the establishment. The CBA will cause injury and loss to the workers, without explicitly agreeing that the contract with which the CBA had signed the agreement would apply to the workers without their consent.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Khuiratta lawyer