Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NASIR versus GUL ZARIN


Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 19 Autos Act (X73 of 1873), Section 6 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume IV, Chap 12B, R9 (viii) Sindh Chief Court Rules, RR 53, 62, 63 , 69 and 70 70, was undoubtedly necessary to take the general evidence of a Muslim witness, but it would be a mistake to withdraw from the legal concept associated with the affidavit and the affirmative affidavit and to bring it down from its popular and historical use. In a very narrow context, the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979 being a special law, requires the parties to prove their own requests by the witnesses in preparation of the affidavit while pursuing section 19 of the ordinance. The affidavits in the evidence filed by the parties, although expressly protected by section 6 (i), are protected. ) Of the Oaths Act, but there was nothing to suggest that witnesses would not be required to take an oath when faced with cross-examination by opponents.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.