MUHAMMAD NASIR versus GUL ZARIN
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 19 Autos Act (X73 of 1873), Section 6 High Court (Lahore) Rules and Orders, Volume IV, Chap 12B, R9 (viii) Sindh Chief Court Rules, RR 53, 62, 63 , 69 and 70 70, was undoubtedly necessary to take the general evidence of a Muslim witness, but it would be a mistake to withdraw from the legal concept associated with the affidavit and the affirmative affidavit and to bring it down from its popular and historical use. In a very narrow context, the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979 being a special law, requires the parties to prove their own requests by the witnesses in preparation of the affidavit while pursuing section 19 of the ordinance. The affidavits in the evidence filed by the parties, although expressly protected by section 6 (i), are protected. ) Of the Oaths Act, but there was nothing to suggest that witnesses would not be required to take an oath when faced with cross-examination by opponents.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Shemier lawyer
