Find a Lawyer

TASECR ALI versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A worker who assigned Cloud Wonder to Grade 1 prayed that the employees of N Section PK be included in this class after adding them to Scale 5. The right to keep employees on a scale was rejected by the employer on the basis that the worker was not a skilled worker because after a thorough, careful and extensive scrutiny of the evidence, such a scale of 5 Labor Court Was not entitled, he found that the worker was a skilled worker and he was entitled to Scale 5, but the appeal of the Labor Court would be overturned. This was because his own witness had clearly stated that his job was to repair the clock and he was a skilled worker, but even the witness presented by the employer admitted that the clock was a Wonder skill. There was a staff in which no one had failed to make an offer. Appealing to the employee's claim of denial of evidence, which was also supported by the employer's testimony, the appellate tribunal found that the clock does not require any expertise, as is based on speculation and limitations, based on the evidence on record. But the Labor Court could not maintain that the worker was a skilled worker and was entitled to the issue of the right to keep him in the NSP5 and, on this occasion, to be entitled to compensation, was to be found right. The appellate tribunal could not be sustained in an unlawful manner patent advocate from Hangu lawyer