Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES), PUNJAB, LAHORE

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction, Practicing an appeal against the order of the District Collector Commissioner, to submit an appeal to the Additional Commissioner who has filed such petition against the petitioner. The search for was rejected. In the constitutional jurisdiction the application of the Board of Revenue Petitioner, which appeals against the order of the District Collector, should have been heard by the Commissioner and not the Commissioner verifying the appeal against the order passed by the District Collector. The source can also be heard and the Additional Commissioner, in the controversial plea, the Additional Commissioner was not given any legal restriction to hear and decide the appeal filed against the District Collector Board of Revenue, which directed that the Commissioner appeal. The Appeals may hear the Commissioner, so either at their discretion can hear the appeal themselves. Or have the same hand. If the Additional Commissioner did not raise any objection to the jurisdiction of the Additional Commissioner for entertaining or hearing the appeal against the order of the District Collector, it would not lie in his mouth to say that this should not have been heard by him. ? It has been pointed out by the Additional Commissioner or the Board of Revenue that, in the circumstances, interference with constitutional jurisdiction was rejected immigration advocates phone number from Shahdad Pur lawyer