Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Retirement Education Patentation Medical Superintendent had to know the age of the Medical Superintendent stated that the record of service of the Petitioner was not 58 years. Labor Court directs applicant to resume employment, but aggravating case with Labor Appellate Tribunal rejects Labor court decision without considering medical opinion Labor Appeal Tribunal has good and valid reasons for ignoring medical opinion Didn't give and considered. Registration is a record of service to be the final proof of the applicant's age, after the respondent chose to conduct a medical examination of the applicant in relation to his age, he had no justification that his department would continue with the applicant's F's record was contradictory Labor court was fully justified The Labor Appellate Tribunal did not properly attend due to the reasons given by the Labor Court in support of its decision, which the Respondent Department of Labor Appellate Tribunal In preference to the certificate, it is said that the benefit of the doubt should be given in the matter of age. The priority given to employees and to medical certificates on disputed records was declared an order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal with no legal authority and the order to reinstate the Labor Court applicant was reinstated. online advocate from Kandhkot lawyer