SAKINA YOUNAS versus ADMINISTRATOR, WOMEN\'S CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL, MULTAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) (f) and Termination of 25 Services The applicant is working as an ad nurse at the Christian Hospital of Women without leave to be absent and the services of the respondent / employer have been filed by the Society Petitioner. Terminated in accordance with the rules of The Labor Complaint was accepted by the Labor Court, which restored it with the benefits of back. On appeal of the order of the Labor Court respondents, the Labor Appellate Tribunal had decided on the basis that the applicant was not an employee and therefore was responsible for attracting the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. A society and a charity organization registered under the Society Act 1860 are operating on a non-profit basis, not commercial or industrial establishment so that the provisions of the Labor Appellate Tribunal's Standing Order Ordinance or Industrial Relations Ordinance Judge may attract a charge. Was not an option In this case, because the applicant was not a doer and that respondent was a Charity A. Organizing and not an industrial and commercial establishment was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Kech lawyer