Sections 103 and 497 control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) and recovery of bailout of 25 intoxicants, delay in the prosecution of the complainant as investigating officer, private witness, 3kg of cannabis In a busy street during the day allegedly recovered from the association, the accused alleged that no private person was involved in the recovery process, the complainant himself investigated the matter and the accused has been under investigation for the past 22 months. If detained, the legitimate investigating officer should not be prejudiced and if the complainant was also an investigating officer of the crime, then the element of such prejudice Also, the provisions of the control section 25 of the Narcotic Substitute Act 1997 could not be ruled out, application of section 103, CR PC was dismissed but such removal did not permit the police investigating officer. Or another such officer in each case to ask for an extension of the benefit to exclude independent witnesses, especially in the least case, to determine further investigation at the bail-out stage, considering the difference between prison life and free life. Needed, the suspect was a young man of phosphoric age and since his arrest he has been behind bars (more than 22 months) The case established against the suspects was very suspicious and further investigated. The High Court has not allowed the perpetrators of the crime to be kept behind bars. Guarantee without guilt was a right guaranteed in guilt and not a right and a guarantee of guarantee in non-bailable offenders, although not a right but guarantee / privilege allowed in situations / partnerships.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
