Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAZEER versus MERCANTILE INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25 Service dismissed Appellant was charged and dismissed as a result of a domestic investigation. had gone. The appellant was convicted of misconduct; the appellant attacked, on three grounds, an unclean order of dismissal. The charge sheet was not signed by the competent authority, ie the employer, the inquiry officer was not transferred despite the mistrust against him, nor was there any evidence to prove the allegations of any witness as an independent The witness was not tested Standing Order 15 Supply (4) No charge sheet is required to be issued but only against the Appellant in his interim inquiry to bring the fact of misconduct to the notice of the employees. No prejudice action was suggested, nor has it been shown that the inquiry officer was in any way prejudiced or biased. There is not enough evidence to keep behavior. Appellant's conviction that while he did not give a reason why he should have been falsely implicated by witnesses, only the appellant's confession that he had been victimized by union activities also appealed. The defendant did not present any testimony in his defense. Demonstrate how dynamic he was in the union or whether the action was taken illegally, the inquiry officer offered Bell's appropriate reasons for employing witnesses against appellant who used abusive gossip against their superiors. Was proved against the appellant and complained to her immigration advocate from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer