M-SHTAQ AHMAD versus HOECHST PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Appellant's Service Appellant's Section 25A Ternatnikin for a period of three months initially; Welder status is assigned on a temporary basis. The extension was extended for three more months and after that the appellant's services were terminated for two more months after which the appointment of the appellant was temporary and the work for which the wrench was put in place eliminated the evidence that the appellant was deprived. The work assigned was more than nine. The appellant who worked for eight months was a temporary worker. Appellant's letter of termination did not clearly indicate that the job for which the appellant was employed had been completed, the appellant had been in service for more than three months, could not be served. ? Even if he was hired to do a temporary job, he could be fired until the job was completed on his own, and Eason was given a termination order and to terminate the appellant's services. The reasons given by the administration were not clearly terminated as the provisions of such standing order no 12 (3) were not strictly worked out and hence the order to terminate the term. The name was separated. And the appellant was reinstated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kamalia lawyer