Find a Lawyer

AMJAD HUSSAIN versus GHULAM RASOOL MIR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974 Section 202 and 367 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/148/149 Enforcement of the Islamic Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Laws (IX of 1974), Section 4/5 Decisions, justification According to the principle that a decision or order given by a de facto judge cannot be held on the ground that its appointment was in violation of the law, it is dependent on ideological necessity and public policy, if the parties. If such an object is allowed to be raised in private litigation, then the judge would be embarrassed and open the door to invading the judge's authority in private proceedings. Opening that he is not a party and given no opportunity to defend him is open to challenge the appointment of a judge by a writ of quote warrant. By not raising any objection to the party in private litigation best law firms from Kot Bunglow lawyer