Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMJAD HUSSAIN versus GHULAM RASOOL MIR


Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974 Section 202 and 367 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/148/149 Enforcement of the Islamic Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Laws (IX of 1974), Section 4/5 Decisions, justification According to the principle that a decision or order given by a de facto judge cannot be held on the ground that its appointment was in violation of the law, it is dependent on ideological necessity and public policy, if the parties. If such an object is allowed to be raised in private litigation, then the judge would be embarrassed and open the door to invading the judge's authority in private proceedings. Opening that he is not a party and given no opportunity to defend him is open to challenge the appointment of a judge by a writ of quote warrant. By not raising any objection to the party in private litigation

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.