versus
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) The applicant's complaint regarding employees' appeal was dropped on the basis that the record Evidence on this shows that the appellant was appointed as a supervisor and that he had done his supervision as well as academic work. Appellant stated in his cross-examination that although he was promoted as a junior officer, he continued to perform the same duties he was performing as a checker but most of the work was supervised by nature and knowledgeable. The work was done by him, if any, he was associated with the job as a caretaker appellant, therefore, could not be considered an artisan within the meaning of section 2 (i) of West Pakistan. Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968)
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Khuiratta lawyer
