AHMED INVESTMENT (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 3 (2) and 7 of the Central Excise and Salt Act (I of 1944), First Schedule Notification No. Section O 555 (1) / 89, Dated 3 6 1989 Notification Section RO 734 (1) / 89, Dated 10 7 The Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of 19813 (1973), Arts 4, 18, and 25 Rings and Cats, both products were not being defined as a single product not only for the purpose of excise duty but also to collect sales tax. They were discriminated against by the applicant. The product against the benefits granted to the invoice maker was irrational and such additional burden violates the equal protection of the law guaranteed by Arts 4, 18 and 25 of the Constitution (1973), and To receive such excise. On the basis of the notification dated 3 6 1989 and 10 7 1989, the duty and sales tax was without any legal authority and without any legal effect in the attempt to amend the notification section RO 555 (1) / 89, dated 3 6 1989. The date was 14 7 1988. Job Notification, Exercise Aid 14 7 1988, 3 6 1989
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Dinga lawyer