Find a Lawyer

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MULTAN

R 4 Salary Appellant / Assistant Sub Inspector Police were charged with assisting a prosecution witness in the recovery of heroin, opium and marijuana because the paid appellant declined to pay instead of regular investigation. Was punished. A small procedure was adopted to show the notice, in which the record shows that the show cause notice was based on the provisions and speculation and that the appellant's affidavit or any evidence to show the prosecution's witness statement under section 164 There was nothing to be said or said. The prosecution's testimony was linked to the Department of Inquiry, alleging the matter was controversial and serious in nature, it was not appropriate to have a regular investigation and to adopt a small procedure related to the appellant and An exception was not made on the basis of any evidence. Undoubtedly, the appellant's pay reduction order was set aside criminal advocate from Badin lawyer